“The Road” by Cormac McCarthy

by dogpound on March 16, 2009 · 64 comments

I’m cold

I know

You know?

I know

I know

You knew?

Yes

Yes

I’m scared

Yes, I know

Ok

Ok

Its cold (sic)

We have to go

I know

Ok

Ok

Can we help him?

No

We have to go?

Yes

Ok

Ok

“The Road” by Cormac McCarthy was easily the worst fucking book I have ever read in my life.

It had no point.

All of the dialogue was just like I wrote up above. You couldn’t tell after 3 lines who was talking to whom.

Let me tell you how it went:

It’s gray. It’s cold. They start a fire. They sleep. They walk. It’s gray. They see a dude. They hide. It’s cold. They start a fire. They’re in the woods. Now it suddenly becomes a town. They’re cold. They start a fire. It snows. It’s gray. They see a kid. They hide. It’s cold. They’re hungry. They run out of food. They find food. It’s cold. They go to a new town. It’s all burned down. There’s a house. The wall paper is peeling. It’s gray. They start a fire. They sleep. They wake up. The man coughs alot. They talk, but you can’t tell who’s saying what. They start a fire. They find some food. They find an old newspaper. There’s a spoon. They take the spoon. They lose the spoon. They’re starving again. They talk about suicide. The man has a dream. It’s cold. They walk some more. It’s still cold. There’s no punctuation. They have incredibly long run on sentences that never seem to want to end, and the whole time you’re thinking to yourself, “why doesn’t this fucking guy use apostrophes?” and then you’re like, “because he’s a pretentious prick and most people are stupid assholes so they think if Oprah recommends it, it must be good” but it never was any good, and you just want it to end all the time, and it’s depressing, and you actually start skimming, then flipping ahead, and then you don’t even read all of the dialogue, then you read none of it, then it ends. (That was what the guy writes like. Silly, awful run-ons)

I’ve been reading the reviews of this book on Amazon, and I find myself almost insulted. By the way people describe this book, it’s “Paradise Lost,” or “Lord of the Flies.” Let me put it to you this way: It. Is. The. Worst. Book. I. Ever. Read.

They made a fire 107 times. McCarthy makes mention of it each time. The cold? 190 times. Walking more? 173. That was the story.

I kept asking myself, “What am I missing? What made all these reviewers and critics love it so much?” Like I said, somehow I’m actually angry. Am I such an ill-informed lout that I can’t see Pulitzer material? Was I so blind as to miss the “Haunting tale of a father’s love for his son” ?

None of that was in there. It’s the same repetitive shit, with no character development, no descriptors (other than that it was cold, oh, and gray) there’s no essential struggle. It’s just the same thing, over and over, and over and over, and over and over and over and over and over.

I started skimming ( as I alluded to previously) and realized: I wasn’t missing a THING.

I stopped reading the “dialogue” and realized I wasn’t missing a THING.

Oh, here’s more dialogue:

We cant (sic)

Why?

Because

Because what?

Because we cant (sic)

Are you sure?

Yes

Yes?

Yes

Ok

Ok?

Yes

Good. We have to go

We do?

Yes

Ok

Ok?

Yes.

I’m scared

You cant be (sic)

I wont be (sic)

Cant be

Wont be! (sic)

Ok

Ok?

Yes

Ok.

Why did we leave him

We couldnt take him (sic)

I saw him!

I know

You dont believe me (sic)

Yes I do

No you dont (sic)

I’m cold

I know

Its cold (sic)

I know

Ok398_wpm_lores

*”Sic” means “Thusly so” in Latin. It denotes misspelling when you’re quoting someone else, as in, when they make mistakes when they write something.

That was it man. It was awful. I kept PRAYING for some redeeming qualities, but all I could think about was Oprah chiding James Frey for the book he read because some people got pissed that his semi-autobiographical work of FICTION, had FICTION in it.

Fuck Oprah.

Fuck Cormac McCarthy.

Fuck “The Road”

Fuck man. I wasted 300 pages of time.

  • email
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • FriendFeed
  • Google Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • Ping.fm
  • Reddit
  • RSS
  • StumbleUpon
  • Tumblr
  • Twitter

{ 64 comments… read them below or add one }

1 Dan March 16, 2009 at 11:43 PM

This is by far the best post you’ve written. So brutal. So. Honest.

Reply

2 Kevin March 17, 2009 at 12:10 PM

i didn’t write it. dogpound hooked it up, but i’m sure he’ll appreciate you saying that he is a better writer than me ;-)

Reply

3 spleeness March 17, 2009 at 11:39 AM

I don’t think I have ever laughed so much at a book review in my life.

Reply

4 Stephanie March 25, 2009 at 9:39 PM

Agreed. The end.

Reply

5 chuck June 11, 2009 at 11:52 AM

Yay! I’ve scoured the web to find one person that thought this book blew. Talk about Emperors New Clothes! What the fuck was that? I did the same thing, reading then scanning, then stopping at the parts where you ask yourself what is wrong with this sick old fuck? Ooooh scary deliverance style boy raping cannibles take over the world. Really? Bullshit Bullshit Bullshit. Your review was Spot On.

Reply

6 Dogpound June 11, 2009 at 4:47 PM

Wait till you see the movie. It looks horrible in the sense that you’ll need therapy after watching it. This book made me want to punch a baby.

Reply

7 Rm Herrman February 19, 2010 at 10:13 PM

I’ve read the rare interview with McCarthy. He’s a cynical old fart who’s primarily concerned with himself and has a pretty low opinion of his own work.

How do I know he has a low opinion of his own work?

Because of how he handles movie deals based on his work. He sells the rights and afterward just doesn’t care. He takes the money and ‘goes to sleep’. It’s “Someone else’s project”.

Why? Because he already has his money, and he already has his fanfolk who won’t care if the story is raped to fit the screen.

To him, it’s just a product produced for suckers. All about the payolla.

Reply

8 john June 29, 2009 at 10:30 PM

I agree wholly with this review.

I read it a year ago so it’s not as fresh in my mind, but my thoughts on this piece of crap were along the lines of:

“Oprah doesn’t know shit about books.”
“This book sucks.”
“What caused this apocalypse and why won’t Cormac McCarthy tell me?”

And when I finally reached the end and the father died and the son was rescued but faced certain death anyway, I remember thinking: “I wasted money on this?”

It would have been more satisfying if the son and father had been eaten slowly by the numerous cannibals they met.

This book sucked and I try to warn as many people as possible not to read it.

Reply

9 Kevin June 29, 2009 at 10:49 PM

i hear that bacon salt is pretty awesome, though. oprah is good for something after all

Reply

10 Serpico August 5, 2009 at 10:03 PM

And I disagree with this post.

The run on sentences are not a problem when you know how to follow along with what’s being said. William Faulkner did it all the time as well. It’s the author’s style of prose writing.

Same with the dialogue. It’s really not that hard to understand who is talking.

And if you didn’t read the whole book and didn’t pick up on the themes then it’s your loss. Next time finish a book before talking shit.

Reply

11 Dogpound August 5, 2009 at 11:59 PM

I see we have a member of the other 50% of the population. This book splits people right down the middle: 50% say it sucks a wang (which it does) while the other 50% seem to think this book itself is the second coming of jesus.

Let’s review some comments:

“This book is Jesus.”
“Without this book, I wouldn’t have been able to change my life in a positive way.”
“McCarthy just wrote a new Bible”
“Cormac is Jesus”
“This is the best book ever written. I am now required to stop reading anything new. My life is downhill from this moment”
“I just queefed; I’m that excited.”

You see, as it is incumbent upon a speaker to be understood (his listeners shouldn’t have to guess what he’s speaking about), so to is it incumbent on a writer to be understood. More than understood, the book has to be interesting. This wasn’t.

Reply

12 Serpico August 6, 2009 at 6:06 PM

A story about a father and sons relationship and the goodness of their relationship, in the hope that during a world in chaos that goodness will prevail spiritually and physically.

Maybe your father beat you when you were young and you hate post-apocalyptic tales, I don’t know, but if that doesn’t interest you then what does?

Reply

13 Dogpound August 7, 2009 at 2:30 AM

All I was able to pick out about the book, with it’s themes of cold, and gray, and depression… was that….

Shit… I dunno… you got me on that one Serpico. My father beat me whenever I didn’t read post-apocalyptic tales. And whenever I didn’t watch “The Breakfast Club.”

He’s a strange man like that.

14 Kevin August 27, 2009 at 10:42 AM

is it strange that this makes me hard?

15 Rm Herrman February 19, 2010 at 10:16 PM

As stories about father and son relationships go, it was a piece of crap.

Maybe in a two dimensional world inhabited by two dimensional sons and two dimensional fathers, it was the bee’s knees. In my dimension, though, it was worthless.

What dimension are you from?

16 Billabong August 28, 2009 at 5:44 PM

Might I implore you to shut the hell up? The book was terrible, and I finished it. Style or not, those sentences turned into abominations. The over-usage of AND, and HE SAID any time the dad finished a sentence pissed me right off. I give him credit, the way he described some things was great, it may have been one of the few things I could give him credit for. But it was just crap! I mean, the first freaking page presented me with a statement that about brought me to pissing on the book, and setting it on fire! Only for my assignment did I stay strong and continue reading. If not for that I would have gladly chucked the book. YES! The story is a great IDEA. The dad and his son struggling along a post-apocalypitc wasteland makes for an incredible story. The themes were good. But the way the author presented them ruined it.

Reply

17 Baldwin August 27, 2009 at 4:42 PM

I skimmed the book at the bookstore; usually that only gives me an idea of whether I’d like to buy it or not, but in this case I felt like I’d read the whole book, because every page I stopped on was the same damn thing.

McCarthy has one of the worst, most tedious prose styles I’ve ever seen. He sometimes has strong storylines and characters, in which case the book can make a decent movie — because the viewer won’t have to plod through the awful overwrought prose.

Reply

18 Baldwin August 27, 2009 at 4:44 PM

Meant to add — some of the positive reviews make me think the reviewers have never read, or even heard of, any of the hundreds of (better) post-apocalypse novels written in the last sixty years.

Reply

19 Dogpound August 27, 2009 at 4:49 PM

A Canticle For Leibowitz, Earth Abides, Down to a sunless sea…. all way better.

Agree w/ your educated post.

Oh, and Kevin…. it’s weird, yes.

Reply

20 Jack September 5, 2009 at 8:28 AM

Same thoughts as most in this post…that “book” sucked…I believe the author wrote in on a dare.

Can I write some shit that these fools will think is great?
Yeah, they all un-educated hill-billies anyway.
Yes, stupid, morons who have never read, seen, done or accomplished anything.
Yeah, they’ll be mesmerized by my dark writig style…it’s goth
Yeah goth, and they all dumb ass, tweeting fools w/out a Passport

Reply

21 Laura September 22, 2009 at 6:18 AM

Haha, you poor, poor people missing out on one of the best books I have ever read!!
May I ask how old yous are?
Perhaps its lack of experience, or maybe yous all like to moan about things but the point of Mc Carthy’s novel, ‘The Road’ has been totally lost in your flicking of pages and lack of understanding.
Obviously yous enjoy clear-cut, straight to the point, Mtv age novels, I feel sorry for the whole lot of yous!!

Reply

22 Kevin September 22, 2009 at 8:51 AM

May I ask what part of the English language has “yous” as a word? Get the fuck out, bitch. Jersey sucks major dick, and so do you.

Reply

23 Laura (another Laura, not above Laura) October 20, 2009 at 2:37 PM

LOL @ yous. Really?!? You are going to argue that this book (which, admittedly I didn’t really like- I got it, I just didn’t like it) is awesome and you use the word yous? Are you a native English speaker? If not, maybe that explains why you liked The Road.

Reply

24 Dogpound September 22, 2009 at 12:33 PM

Really? I’ll out-read, and out-command you in the English Language any day. I can dance around the Etymology of the words he’s used in this “Masterpiece.” Really, it’s a Masterpiece of Shit.

It has no redeeming qualities, and if you liked it, it’s probably because you’re watching Oprah instead of working for a living.

Reply

25 Baldwin October 15, 2009 at 1:26 PM

Well, I’m 48. I’ve been reading books since 1966. I enjoyed “Gravity’s Rainbow”, I’ve enjoyed Petrarch and Cervantes, and I’ve enjoyed stories far grimmer than “The Road”. So, it doesn’t have to be simple in either style or concept. I get what McCarthy was trying to do with his style; I just think it was a bad idea.

Makes me want to read “Riddley Walker” again.

Now, I hope we’re done with the insults. (Please note that if you must use it, the word is “youse”, not “yous”.)

Reply

26 Dogpound October 15, 2009 at 5:28 PM

I’ve come to the conclusion that this was a successful episode of trolling, and we all fell for it.

HUZZAH!

Reply

27 Rm Herrman February 19, 2010 at 10:21 PM

This is typical of MC fans in the blogosphere. His book sucked rancid monkey balls, so you have to make stupid assumptions about people who are unashamed to admit that it did, in fact, suck rancid monkey balls.

Fine, I’ll make what’s probably a more accurate assumption about his rabid fans:

You have crappy taste, lady. I bet your writing (if you actually do any) sucks even worse than McCarthy’s.

Cormac McCarthy: wooden idol of literary poseurs everywhere.

Reply

28 Savage Tegu November 12, 2009 at 5:59 PM

Ah, “The Road”. How do I absolutely fucking loathe this piece of shit excuse for a novel? Let me count the ways… Vile, pretentious,supremely unrealistic and flat-out stupid, every copy of this steaming pile of literary fecal matter should be burned or shredded as nesting material for rodents. All right, some grubby consumptive schmuck(The Man) and his filthy, parasite-infested kid(The Boy) toddle around in A POST-APOCALYPTIC WASTELAND,pushing a shopping cart full of rags and debris. Asshole McCarthy can’t be bothered to explain what happened to bring on this apocalypse, so we just have to take it on faith that it was real bad and stuff. All plant life is dead. All animal life(with the exception of one mangy dog) is also, but there are still a fair number of cannibalistic humans wandering about. The Boy had a mom who talked like Primaat Conehead but she checked out at some time in the past. The Man and The Boy build lots of campfires and have endless monosyllabic conversations about how hungry they are and how cold it is…Sweet Jesus in a Coupe de Ville, please kill me now. I’ve got to give McRetard credit, however. after dispensing with plot, character development and dialogue, he doesn’t trouble his readers with punctuation, either. OY! Cormac McCarthy is a sham author, and “The Road” is a work of arch-phoniness. I’m certain that old bastard is chuckling grimly over his success at suckering Oprah and her idiot followers into swallowing his horseshit and swelling his bank account(and ego).

Reply

29 Singin Sam November 29, 2009 at 1:56 PM

“Savage Tegu” you sound like a bitch on the rag, so STFU!

Reply

30 Dogpound November 29, 2009 at 4:19 PM

Sam- you sound like an idiot, but I don’t call you out on it.

Why don’t you go to the mythical land where all of you McCarthy fans stand around in a circle and masturbate to thoughts of his work.

Then drink some poisoned Kool-Aide. The rest of the world will miss you…. no wait, no we won’t.

Reply

31 Singin Sam April 12, 2010 at 4:14 PM

It’s Kool-Aid, oh Jew.

Reply

32 Rm Herrman February 19, 2010 at 10:07 PM

What he wrote in a single post was worth more than CM wrote in that entire stinking book.

‘STFU’?

Ah, another McCarty fan.

Are you on the rag?

No

Sure?

Yes.

Sure?

Im scared

Ok

Ok?

Ok

Why?

We carry the torch

Why?

Because

Because?

Yes

Ok

Reply

33 Duoshot December 3, 2009 at 11:25 PM

YES! Finally, a person who sees the truth.
It is repetitive as shit. i read the Wikipedia article and still aced the test.
I still think that the world was destroyed by nuclear bombs, like Terminator, but unfortunately, McCarthy doesn’t tell us.

What are their names? Who writes books and doesn’t name their characters?

When I’m 75 and run out of money, I plan to write a book that goes nowhere, and has no quotations, and they say okay every few sentences. Success, here I come!

Reply

34 Rm Herrman February 19, 2010 at 9:55 PM

What I want to know is:

What in the hells did the man and the boy eat in the years after this unknowable disaster?

Answer: CM didn’t even bother to think about it. Any more than he bothered to think about what the specific cause of the disaster was. In his words, it was ‘irrelevant’.

You see, ‘The Road’ was a work of magical surrealism pretending to be a post apocalyptic novel.

If anyone dares to call it ‘speculative fiction’, I’ll hurl. I swear it.

Reply

35 Singin Sam April 12, 2010 at 4:49 PM

Another stinking Jew talking jerusalem about this wonderful speculative fiction. STFU, Jew!

Reply

36 Steve December 28, 2009 at 8:49 PM

You couldn’t be more dead on in your review…I just finished this piece of crap about 10 minutes ago..what a complete waste of my time…NOTHING happens…nothing…

Reply

37 Rm Herrman February 19, 2010 at 10:03 PM

Not so. One thing happened: It ended.

Then I threw it away. I threw it away with more vigor, passion, and purpose than he put into writing it.

I had to read it, you see. The reviewers, the sites, they all claimed the novel was a ‘masterwork’. I just had to push through and figure out what the guy’s magic was.

I found out. His ‘magic’ was reputation and marketing. Nothing more.

Reply

38 woofman January 13, 2010 at 10:41 PM

The only redeeming quality that this book has is that it has zombies in it and the copy I found at my local library a few summers ago was an Oprah book and it made me happy to think that soccer moms and women who read everything that’s an Oprah book were reading about zombies in a post apocalyptic world.

I do agree that the writing and dialogue in the book was poorly written and I skimmed it.

It would have been nice if McCarthy actually did put some more plot in and told us just how the world got so apocalyptic and dismal aside from the very brief flashbacks that he did write about.

It would have been nice had McCarthy fleshed out his characters more but he didn’t and we as readers suffered for it.

I have read other books by McCarthy and I found them to be all action and flash but very poor writing and very blank characters that we do not know anything at all about.

Reply

39 woofman January 13, 2010 at 10:46 PM

I fail to see just how and why this book won the Pulitzer prize and why Hollywood is going to make a movie out of it that I’m sure people who mentally masturbate over this book in praise and McCarthy will flock to see?

I’m glad I did not pay money for this book.

Reply

40 Baconscratch January 16, 2010 at 5:36 AM

Hilarious review. I couldn’t agree more. If ‘The Road’ is what passes for Pulitzer-worthy writing these days, then I will stick to Reader’s Fucking Digest, thank you…

On a more serious note, I wanted to like this book. Really, I wanted to like it. I love reading post-apocalyptic tales because they mesh with my jaded view of what lies in store for humanity. I figure I might at least pick up something useful from the genre, should such an end come sooner rather than later. At worst, I’ll be entertained for a few hours. Well, I was neither informed nor entertained by this waste of paper. This book blows.

In one sense, ‘The Road’ is like the other three McCarthy books I’ve read and re-read (Blood Meridian, No Country for Old Men, can’t remember the last one…Horses?), trying to figure what the hell I am missing that others aren’t missing. McCormack’s prose, in attempting to be ‘uncluttered’ and ‘spartan,’ comes across as at once sickeningly artsy-fartsy-pretentious and a-baboon-wrote-this-simplistic-drivel. No character development. No backstory. No flow. No punctuation. No desire to turn the next page. Repetition, repetition. I mean, come on; punctuation exists for a reason. Avoiding its use does not make you look like you are such a singularly phenomenal author that you can cast aside basic stylistic formulae to show us how cool, advanced and liberated you are. It makes you look like a fucking idiot, and any story you wanted to tell us went out the window with all the apostrophes and quotation marks.

I’m sure there is a story in ‘The Road’ somewhere. It’s probably a pretty damned good story, at that. Unfortunately, since Cormack McCarthy has zero writing talent, ‘The Road’ is incapable of sharing that story with us. Damn, I want my hours back…

Reply

41 Rm Herrman February 19, 2010 at 9:51 PM

I’m glad people with your tastes are out there, mate. 80% done with a post-apocalyptic first draft. Remember my name for a couple of years; if you see it on a cover, pick up what you find. I’ll strive to please in every non-sexual way you can imagine.

Yes, I do love the Fallout series and yes, I strive to avoid every single cliche and stereotype related to it.

Can’t avoid the possible themes, though. I mean, how many themes are there in a world where pretty much every living person and every living animal and plant has been wiped out by nuclear winter?

Reply

42 Vadajoe January 31, 2010 at 11:49 PM

I have read some horrible stuff in my days, but this one pissed me off so bad I wanted to reach out to Mr. McCarthy via his website to vent my frustration, possibly in a non-constructive manner, just to wash the crap of this book out of my system…. big mistake.

If you visit this pretentious pricks(<– no apostrophe to empphasize my writing prowess) website, you will find "The Cormac McCarthy Society" WTF???

The Society's stated purpose is "to further the scholarship and general appreciation of Cormac McCarthy's writing and to facilitate the gathering of scholars and enthusiastic lay readers alike who share a common interest in Cormac McCarthy and his work." … blah blah blah

Are you fucking kidding me?

On his contact page, its (<–no apostrophe, again to emphasize my writing prowess) even worse… The Cormac McCarthy Society respects the author's clearly expressed desire for privacy. However, should you wish to contact Cormac McCarthy, write to him care of his agent, Amanda Urban

So, instead of frustrating myself further, I went looking for others who felt "dirty" and cheating of precious time by having read this crap.

Thank you Dogpound for this review, I am glad I'm not alone on this one.

On second thought, I wish I had two copies of this book….. One to shit on, and one to cover it up.

Reply

43 Rm Herrman February 19, 2010 at 9:45 PM

I’ve felt so alone. Someone told me that I ‘hated art’ because I threw that book into the garbage rather than inflict it on someone else.

Let me see if I can be a ‘master’ too.

Did I write that?

I did.

why

why not

Am I bad?

Yes

Why

Why not?

Because

Because why

Im scared (sic)

Ok

Ok?

Ok. Im a master now (sic)

Why?

Why not

Man, that felt good. Thanks for the honest post. Let the pretention fanboys and wannabes suck it up.

Reply

44 Dogpound February 19, 2010 at 10:39 PM

RM Herrman- if you write it, I will read it. Seriously.

That’s not even a compliment though, because ANYONE could write a better book than McCarthy.

Still, if you put a book to paper, I’ll have you sign a copy for me.

Reply

45 RM Herrman March 9, 2010 at 12:36 AM

Will do. I’m about a month from finishing the first draft, three from the polish, so maybe next year or the year after if everything goes well.

Reply

46 Wondering Woman February 20, 2010 at 4:43 PM

I just finished the book and it didn’t waste too much of my time because it was soooo FUCKING BAD that I skipped through about 3/4 of it. After the 20th gray, cold, hungry, tired, scenario I opted for speed reading. I went to Amazon to warn people away and was astounded with the “OMG this is the best book ever” reviews. Got scared that I’d slipped over into the Twilight Zone so searched “the road, worst book ever” and found out I’m not alone…….. no wonder Hollow Wood wanted to make a movie from it.

Reply

47 shizroe February 23, 2010 at 12:05 AM

This book was at my reeding level. I licked the book. It was a page turner. I,m glad oprah winfried recommended this one. I reed the whole thing in less than 2 months!

Reply

48 Annie June 14, 2010 at 2:32 AM

Laughing out loud, for real…

Reply

49 Singin Sam March 10, 2010 at 10:08 AM

I will shit upon the jews.

Reply

50 Singin Sam March 10, 2010 at 10:09 AM

I will urinate on Jerusalem.

Reply

51 Cormac Mccarthy April 9, 2010 at 12:11 AM

LOL, you guys are mad as hell…and you sound like a bunch of virgin grammar nazi’s.

Reply

52 Wondering Woman April 11, 2010 at 5:13 PM

Virgin grammar nazi, wow! I bow in deference to your awesomeness.

Reply

53 Nik Logan April 17, 2010 at 2:18 AM

Oh, thank god.
I thought I might be the only one in the world who was wondering, what the fuck was wrong with this book. 1/3 of the way through the book, I thought to myself, if this idiot uses the word ‘black’ or ‘ash’ in the next paragraph one more time, I’m going to scream. Lo and behold, the next sentence had ‘ash’ in it (once again) and the next sentence after that had black in it (in an ad nauseum reference to the dead trees). WE GET IT. EVERYTHING’S DEAD, MOVE ON YOU PRETENTIOUS PRICK. I could write better prose when I was five.
After thinking this, I remember saying to my husband, “pulitzer prize, my ass.’ But I assumed it was me, that I was the problem. I figured, maybe the ending was the real clincher. That’s where it must get good; some profound moment that enlightens me and forever changes the way I view the world. NOPE. Not there either. Apparently, the Pulitzer Prize is now a subsidiary of HARPO. Good to know, for future reference.

I am so glad, that I am not alone in my utter distate for this novel (thank god I bought it used from Value Village, I would hate to think a dime of my money went to that dickwad). Thank you, so very much. I bookmarked your post. Just so that, in times of need, I can return and console myself with the thought that, its not me, the book is really just a piece of shit.

Reply

54 Martha April 21, 2010 at 3:09 AM

Fuck! I just read it for my literature class. Slowily, and all together. So we could speak about it. Think about it. Debat about it. But what we are going to speak, think or debate about?

That book says nothing. Is a dude and his kid. Walking. On a road. Cold, gray, hungry are the only adjectives. Why? Why not? Is that Ok? Yes. Yes? Yes it is.

Plz, make a favor to yourself. And. DON’T read it. If you try you will end scaning it willing to finish the quicker possible.

Reply

55 AWAKE May 27, 2010 at 8:46 AM

Right on. This book sucked big time.

Take one part Koike and Kojima’s ‘Lone Wolf and Cub’, one part Niven and Barnes ‘Lucifer’s Hammer’ (Really! It is about a meteor that hits the earth and ends civilization as we know it. There are roving packs of cannibals and, best part, repeated references to ‘the road’ as in, it is the worst place to go.) and one part pretension et voila’! Crap book.

And another pet peeve. When an author discovers a word and can’t seem to stfu about it. See ‘Lavened’. Ugh. Crap book.

Reply

56 DW June 2, 2010 at 2:55 AM

THANK YOU!!! I hate when I am at a social gathering and people blather on about the “Symbolic” Nature of this crap book/film, and if you don’t like it you are a dullard. One woman even compared it to the US capitalistic health care system… Can you believe it? I should have known since it was written by McCarthy – I had the same reaction to No Country for Old Men. So in essence the emperor is wearing no clothes and we are obligated not to point that out in polite company.

Reply

57 Annie June 14, 2010 at 2:27 AM

Cormac McCarthy is the laziest, most mediocre writer who sneakily passes his unthought-out crap off as art, ever! It’s baffling! I can’t make my way completely through one of his stupid books, despite glowing references from friends whose opinions I respect. Many people say The Road is ambiguous on purpose. Well, I say it’s ambiguous because it’s author is a lazy, self-centered hack who didn’t feel like wasting his time making anything ‘real’. So it’s ‘allogorical’. MY ASS it is!
Bottom line, I think a dad would kill himself rather than hang out with his kid and no TV, way, way before a mom would dream of it.
The Coen Bros. were the best thing that ever happened to him.

Reply

58 Author Prophetess Gwendolyn king June 16, 2010 at 8:37 AM

http://www2.xlibris.com/BOOKSTORE/search.aspx?q=Gods+Spoken+Word&x=32&y=9 http://www2.xlibris.com/bookstore 
Gods Spoken Word is a ruff urban look insided the begining of aswel as the perfect, strategic timing of God, as He raises up His endtime Prophet for such a time in the world as this. For her misery became her ministry. From molestation, to drug abuse, rape, a victim of  conspired hate and racism, to becoming one of the most sought after female drug dealer in the midwest. From a lifestyle of  prision hustling to street boostn. The redeeming power of Yahshua Jesus lies in between these pages, and yes after all that!! SHE STILL STANDN!! The Lord has givin her His grace to pursue His divine purpose at all cost as she keeps her holy foot on the enemies neck! Never losing focus to her kingdom assignment.  There is without a doubt Gods amazing Glory in this Habakkuk2:3story. As She goes forth proclaiming  Yahshua Jesus ever so transforming, life changing!!  delivering love gift  of Salvation, His Goodnews around the world!! Matthew 16:15/
 Juz a brief bio of what this book is about. I’m  currently working on my other book, although this book here will alwaz be my favorite, eventhough I went through hell and back lol.. I experience so much spiritual warfare I was nuts!! And caused afew hit and misses… BUT GOD will use everyone for HIS AMAZN GLORY!!
PRAY MY STRENGTH!!! 
EVERY PART OF BOOK IZ PRODUCTION READY!!

Reply

59 Kevin June 16, 2010 at 8:42 AM

Congratulations. You are a waste of carbon. Nobody will buy your piece of shit book with such a lack of writing skills. It also helps to make some fucking sense, bitch.

Reply

60 Pulitzer_Are_You_Kidding_Me July 5, 2010 at 4:23 PM

This is perhaps the best book review I have ever read.

If this heap of shit can be passed off as a “book”, then 5 pages of my book will have more entertainment value and “food for thought” and quotable quotes than than entire slop of sh*t combined.

Steven King’s “The Stand” made this book look like it was written by a fucking 3rd grader. No, maybe 7th grader and his instant messaging logs.. Truly the worst book I have ever pissed away my time reading. F*cking garbage.

“The Road” was the most important book of my life,
b/c it showed me that it’s now my time to write ….

Reply

61 Manuel Royal August 17, 2010 at 11:07 AM

Rock on (Pulitzer_Are_You_Kidding_Me). Our best response to books we don’t like is to write the kind of book we want to read. You and me both.

Reply

62 Johnny Appleseed July 25, 2010 at 7:33 AM

hahahaha…I watched the movie, in 1.5x and 10x and only stopped when I saw something interesting happen. FUCKING BORING! Humanity, this humanity that…Absolutely boring. And how hard would it have been to tell us what the hell caused this? It’s not that hard a simple, “These guys nuked these guys” or “an asteroid hit..” something fuck.

Reply

63 will August 11, 2010 at 1:55 PM

The reason for the destruction does not matter, it is irrelevant. However the book does suck.

The only use for the various linked stories is would be to incorporate the various areas into something like Fallout 4. Dump the kid and all the glory of suicide and it would make sure interesting locations.

Reply

64 Manuel Royal August 17, 2010 at 11:03 AM

It’s baffling that this book won a Pulitzer. The exact same book, written by an unknown, would likely never have found a publisher, let alone won what was once a very prestigious award.

I’ve read hundreds of post-apocalypse stories, written from the 19th century on. Like “The Road”, many of them echo Biblical themes, but usually with more subtlety. Go read the 1954 “Lot’s Daughter” by Ward Moore. I think the reviewers who fawned over “The Road” must think there’s an original concept there.

The dream sequence that opens the book is like a parody of ridiculous overwrought prose. McCarthy himself has become a parody; he wrote some great stuff in the ’60s, but in his later books he either disdains (extremely useful) punctuation to try and achieve a “spare” style, or throws a bucket of (sometimes incompatible) metaphors at every event to try and convey profundity.

Reply

Leave a Comment

You can use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Previous post:

Next post: